Chapter 15 Short essay Questions
1. How
and why did the Dred Scott decision, the Lincoln-Douglas debates, and the
election of 1860 move the nation toward the civil war?
I.
Dred Scott, a slave, was taken from the
slave state of Missouri to the Free State of Wisconsin. When his master died, he sued for his freedom
on the grounds of his residence in a free territory. In this case the Court
faced two key issues: (1) did Scott’s residence in free territory during the
1830s make him free and Regardless of the answer to the above question (2) did
Scott, again enslaved in Missouri have the right to sue for his freedom in
federal courts. Since the Supreme Court was composed mostly of southerners,
they ruled against Scott. They ruled that blacks (slave or free) were not
citizens of the United States Also ruled that the Missouri Compromise had
always been unconstitutional because Congress had no right to exclude slavery
from any territory. To do so would violate the 5th Amendment protection of
property and property holders. The Republicans denounced the decision and
prepared to ignore it
Ø The
Dred Scott pleases the South, but displeases the North. In fact many Northerners
ignored it. The fact that the Supreme Court ruled the Missouri Compromise
unconstitutional angered many Northerners.
It cancelled out the compromise and broke the bandage that kept the
North and South at peace.
II.
The Lincoln-Douglas Debates
·
During the senate campaign Lincoln challenged
Douglas to a series of debates now titled the “Lincoln-Douglas Debates”. Lincoln
began with his famous “House Divided” speech.- a nation cannot exist
permanently half slave and half free. Douglass used the debates to portray
Lincoln as a virtual abolitionist and an advocate of racial equality. However,
in the debates, Lincoln attacked slavery as morally evil but denied that
Congress had the right to abolish it in the South or that he favored equality
for black. Rather, he stuck to his position that barring slavery from the
territories. Although Douglas won the IL Senate seat, the election further
split the Democratic Party. It also made Lincoln “famous in the North and
infamous in the South”
Ø The
South was displeased that Slavery could be excluded from territories if special
law are not made to protect slavery. This is the Freeport Doctrine. During
these debates, Lincoln was called an abolitionist because he did not believe in
a country divided over slavery. He did not approve of extending slavery, but nor
did he believe in eradicating from the south. Still the South did not like him.
III.
The election of 1860
·
In
the The
election of 1860 the
Republicans broadened their appeal in the free states in 1860 by supporting a
protective tariff, federal aid for internal improvements, and a homestead act.
They nominated Lincoln for President. The northern and southern Democrats were
unable to agree on a platform so they split giving Lincoln the chance to win.
·
Since the South had already hated
Lincoln, they were really upset he was elected. In fact he did not receive any
votes from the south and still he got elected. This meant that the South did
not equal representation to the North. Also many of the Southern Ballots did
not even have Lincoln’s name so many Southerners were mad to have a president
that wasn’t even on the ballot.
2. How
did the North and South attempt to bring their economic resources to bear to
win the civil war? Why was the North more successful in the end?
a. The
South tried to use Cotton diplomacy to win the war. It was the biggest cotton
producer. England and other textile countries needed the cotton to for their
textile industries. The South hoped to win the support of England and France because
they needed the South’s cotton.
b. The
North used its massive industry to win. It had numerous factories that mass
produced weapons and clothing. It also had a strong national government that
could support raising taxes and printing paper money. The North eventually won
because it could outlast the South’s resources.
The South eventually ran out of resources, while the North could replenish
its resources with the massive factories.
3. What
was “cotton diplomacy” and why did it fail?
a. The
South tried to use Cotton diplomacy to win the war. It was the biggest cotton
producer. England and other textile countries needed the cotton to for their
textile industries. The South hoped to win the support of England and France
because they needed the South’s cotton.
b. The
Cotton diplomacy failed for three reasons. First, because of slavery. Uncle
Tom’s Cabin, touched the heart of the Queen of England, and convinced her to
not support the South when Lincoln issued the Proclamation Emancipation,
freeing the Southern slaves. France followed England’s suit. Second reason was
the draw at Antietam. Since the South did not win the battle, France and
England were convinced to not support the CSA. The third reason was because the
South was no longer the only place to get cotton from Cotton could now be
acquired from colonies in Egypt and other countries.
4. Describe
at least three major battles, campaign, or strategies that marked turning
points in the war. Explain why they helped to ensure a Union victory.
a. Battle
of Antietam: the battle was a draw. It was one of the bloodiest battles in US
history. It was because of the South’s inability to win, that France and
England did not support the South. This victory led to Lincoln giving the
Proclamation Emancipation, freeing the Southern slaves. This just gave the
European countries another reason to not help the South. Also more slaves
started to runaway. They joined the Union army and added to manpower, thus giving
the North a huge advantage.
b. The
next turning point battle took place in 1863. In the battle of Vicksburg, the
Union gained the Mississippi River. After a long siege, General Ulysses Grant
takes full control of the Mississippi. This dealt a huge blow to the South. Not
only did it split the South in half, but is also stopped the South’s trade and
transportation. The South did not have railroads, so they depended on the river
for transportation.
c. The
last thing that truly turned the tides was Sherman’s March to the Sea. General
William T. Sherman started from Atlanta and went to Savannah, destroying
everything in his path. He burned down everything in his path. This destroyed
the morale of the South, and caused the men to leave the army to come back to families
and the land. They came back to reconstruct the damage. After this the South no
longer had the heart to fight.
No comments:
Post a Comment